Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Can Schools Ban Student Cellphones From The Premises?


Cell phones on school grounds is becoming a highly debated topic lately. More and more schools are adopting the policy of prohibiting students from bringing cell phones to school. The immediate question that comes to mind is, can schools legally ban their students from bringing a cell phone to school?

The best way to answer this question is to look at both sides of this debate. Those in favor of students having cell phones, meaning the parents of these students, (sorry boys and girls, but a teenager's claim to why they might need a cell phone in school holds no weight in this conversation) have a few logical reasons as to why their child should possess a cell phone in school. It basically boils down to parents challenging schools banning cell phones on the basis that it interferes with their constitutional right to guide the care, custody and control of their children. I'm not necessarily buying that argument, but it is not totally without merit.

The school's argument for banning cell phones is based on specific instances that take place on a daily basis as a result of allowing students to have cell phones in school. These incidents include but are not limited to harassment, intimidation and cheating. So, the question remains, who has the last say when it comes to cell phones in school.

Ultimately it comes down to the school district's policy, meaning the school can set policy denying students the right to bring cellphones to school. Se Price v New York City Board of Education, 51 A.D. 3d 277 (2008) The court said the ban was within the districts authority to create regulations governing discipline and was not subject to judicial intervention.

Why not a compromise then? Let students bring their cell phones to school and keep them in their lockers turned off. Most schools have a policy similar to this, but let's be honest. If a teenager is bringing their cell phone to school, do you really think they're going to turn it off and put it in their locker. Cell phones are so small and compact that they can be hidden anywhere. It's just too much of a temptation for teens to carry it on their person because they don't think they're going to get caught. Now when teens surreptitiously use their phones in school, teachers have to take time to discipline the student for violating school rules. This takes time away from classroom instruction, which in and of itself gives the school more of a reason to ban cell phones from being brought to school.

There are still parents out there that are going to argue that this ban will take away their fundamental right to child rearing. If we compare this banning of cell phones to another case we will see this is not necessarily the case. The courts have upheld that schools can not distribute condoms. The reason being it interferes with the parents' right to guide the sexual activity of their children. When comparing the cases you see that not allowing a child to have a cell phone in school has very little interference on child rearing.

The school ultimately falls back on its safety net, which is the legitimate goal of keeping discipline and order in school, and overcoming any hindrance to the furtherance of education.

Sorry teens, if the school says no phones the law is on their side.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

My Rant of the Month


I just don't understand the popularity of Twitter. Can somebody please explain to me how posting a message in under 140 characters has swept across this nation like an outbreak of the Swine Flu. Twitter has become so popular that it's developing its own language. Celebrities and pro athletes are popping up all over the Twitter network. Some of these athletes have even gone so far as to "tweet" during games. Many pro teams have hired people or created a position within the organization to monitor what their players are "tweeting" about. Chad Johnson just said if his team makes it to the Superbowl, (fat chance) he'll be "tweeting" on the sidelines during the game.

Don't social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace encompass what Twitter does? Can't we post stuff that we want our friends and family to see, and not be restricted by 140 Characters? Twitter claims this is part of the reason for their success. Maybe, but the fact still remains that people think they're a lot more interesting than they really are. People "tweet" about everything from losing their jobs to what they ate for lunch. We're starting to take ourselves a little too seriously in this country. Do you really think people care what you ate for lunch?

I heard the average person on Twitter "tweets" between 2 and 3 times a day, with some people "tweeting" well over ten times a day. Who has the time to do this, and what is so important that you have to the let the world know what you just did. The president of the United States is not quoted ten times a day, and to tell you the truth I could care less what Obama had for breakfast, or that he switched his brand of toilet paper because of chaffing.

I think we need to get a grip. There may be some good uses for Twitter and I'd like to hear what they are.